True or False: If something is not in compliance with the code and approved by the building inspector, the building inspector is liable for any consequences or damages.

The assertion that building inspectors are liable for consequences or damages resulting from non-compliant work that they have approved is generally false. Building inspectors are tasked with ensuring that construction projects adhere to local codes and regulations; however, their role typically provides them with certain legal protections.

When inspectors make decisions based on the information available at the time, they are acting in their capacity as public officials, and in most jurisdictions, they are protected from personal liability unless there is clear evidence of negligence. This means that mere approval of non-compliant work does not automatically transfer liability to the inspector.

The rationale behind this is to encourage inspectors to perform their duties without the fear of personal repercussions for decisions made in good faith based on their professional judgment. Hence, the idea that inspectors are liable simply for approving something non-compliant, without additional circumstances such as negligence being proven, does not align with the typical legal framework governing their responsibilities.